"Like sparkling cider or vintage Chateauneuf de Rothschild Champagne, older can be BETTER, but ONLY when and IF you know HOW. Save your joints AND your health by becoming an (informed) Primal Dieter as verified and defined by the world's most advanced nutritionist, Aajonus Vonderplanitz, PhD.
Our medical system is now broken and is not likely to be fixed in our lifetime. Hospitals are overflowing with MILLIONS of Madison Avenue-produced SAD [Standard American Diet] eaters and pill-poppers. Alternatively, nothing makes more sense nor is more in keeping with natural laws than the Primal Diet, i.e. EVERY cell in your body is replaced every seven (7) years. That gives you a fair chance to have an entirely new, more youthful and vitally healthy body seven years from today. The instincts of our ancestral 'Cave Men' were verifiable and correct. Today, enlightened Primal Diet adherents everywhere know that the final word in dietary science has now become the hue and cry of 'Back To The Future.' Why not start building your ALL-NEW 'cave man' body today.
Open a bold, all-new chapter in your life. Go to: www.wewant2live.com, go to the http://www.wewant2live.blogspot.com, check out the hundreds of enthusiastic PD user's personal testaments, then just as if you've had an epiphany, buy both of Dr. Vonderplanitz' books and become a PD Newsletter subscriber. Armed with the most accurate, advanced and fact-based dietary truth available anywhere, your health will then from that day forward begin to shoot straight up." Contributed by Mark Ray of Alabama
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Monday, April 19, 2010
Person saved by the Primal Diet says so...
in response to Aajonus' recent UK radio interview. The following was posted to the www.talksport.com site by a listener who lives in South America:
" Aajonus Vonderplanitz unequivocally pointed me toward the means of saving my own life; not to mention restoring my quality of life to that of half this age. In my humble opinion, anyone who would thwart this man or disparage what he has to say becomes an accomplice to cruelty and negligent homicide.
"Modern Medicos" operating with a lopsided "education," written and funded by the drug-pushing big-pharma syndicate, are ill-equipped to honor an oath to do no harm.
The only harm resulting from the diet recommendations of Aajonus Vonderplanitz is to the reputation of doctors whose medical patients refuse to succumb decades beyond being given a few weeks or months to live."
" Aajonus Vonderplanitz unequivocally pointed me toward the means of saving my own life; not to mention restoring my quality of life to that of half this age. In my humble opinion, anyone who would thwart this man or disparage what he has to say becomes an accomplice to cruelty and negligent homicide.
"Modern Medicos" operating with a lopsided "education," written and funded by the drug-pushing big-pharma syndicate, are ill-equipped to honor an oath to do no harm.
The only harm resulting from the diet recommendations of Aajonus Vonderplanitz is to the reputation of doctors whose medical patients refuse to succumb decades beyond being given a few weeks or months to live."
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Wisconsin - the dairy state?
On Monday April 19th 2010, a court case is being held in Viroqua, Wisconsin apparently without a complaint or a crime having been committed. The details are given on the http://rawmilkparty.com/site. Max explains it pretty well so just visit there. To get the full story on raw milk, click here. Full information is in the expert report put together by Aajonus Vonderplanitz and Dr. Douglass.
Sunday, April 11, 2010
On March 29th, federal district court Judge Robert Sweet made history by issuing the first ruling ever that human genes can't be patented. The ruling follows a lawsuit brought by a group of patients and scientists...
Aajonus was blowing the whistle on similar practices back in earlier days, for instance in this early version of the report he authored with Dr. Douglass on Natural Milk. You may search this document for Dr. Samuel Epstein for the discovery related to cancer. The final version of this important document can be obtained by clicking here.
The lawsuit ruling on March 29th was against Myriad Genetics and the University of Utah Research Foundation, which hold the patents on the BRCA genes, as well the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The suit charged that the challenged patents are illegal and restrict both scientific research and patients' access to medical care, and that patents on human genes violate the First Amendment and patent law.
The specific patents challenged are on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Mutations along the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for most cases of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Myriad's monopoly on the BRCA genes makes it impossible for women to access alternate tests or get a second opinion about their results—allowing Myriad to charge a high rate for their tests.
The precedent-setting ruling marks the first time a court has found patents on genes unlawful and calls into question the validity of patents now held on approximately 2,000 human genes.
Approximately 20 percent of all human genes are patented, including genes associated with Alzheimer's disease, muscular dystrophy, colon cancer, asthma and many other illnesses.
"This ruling is a victory for the free flow of ideas in scientific research," said first amendment attorney Chris Hansen. "The human genome—like the structure of blood, air or water—was discovered, not created. There is an endless amount of information on genes that begs for further discovery, and gene patents put up unacceptable barriers to the free exchange of ideas." (Data from New York Times Judge Invalidates Human Gene Patent)
Aajonus was blowing the whistle on similar practices back in earlier days, for instance in this early version of the report he authored with Dr. Douglass on Natural Milk. You may search this document for Dr. Samuel Epstein for the discovery related to cancer. The final version of this important document can be obtained by clicking here.
The lawsuit ruling on March 29th was against Myriad Genetics and the University of Utah Research Foundation, which hold the patents on the BRCA genes, as well the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The suit charged that the challenged patents are illegal and restrict both scientific research and patients' access to medical care, and that patents on human genes violate the First Amendment and patent law.
The specific patents challenged are on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Mutations along the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for most cases of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Myriad's monopoly on the BRCA genes makes it impossible for women to access alternate tests or get a second opinion about their results—allowing Myriad to charge a high rate for their tests.
The precedent-setting ruling marks the first time a court has found patents on genes unlawful and calls into question the validity of patents now held on approximately 2,000 human genes.
Approximately 20 percent of all human genes are patented, including genes associated with Alzheimer's disease, muscular dystrophy, colon cancer, asthma and many other illnesses.
"This ruling is a victory for the free flow of ideas in scientific research," said first amendment attorney Chris Hansen. "The human genome—like the structure of blood, air or water—was discovered, not created. There is an endless amount of information on genes that begs for further discovery, and gene patents put up unacceptable barriers to the free exchange of ideas." (Data from New York Times Judge Invalidates Human Gene Patent)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
